Friday, May 31, 2019
Justice Explored in Nathaniel Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter Essay
Justice Explored in The Scarlet letter   Nathaniel Hawthorne created themes in The Scarlet Letter just as significant as the obvious ideas pertaining to sin and Puritan society. Roger Chillingworth is a character through which one of these themes resonates, and a character that is often underplayed in analysis. His weakness and path of destruction of himself and others are summed up in one of Chillingworths last sentences in the novel, to Arthur Dimmesdale Hadst thou sought the whole earth over... there were no place so secret, no high place nor lowly place, where thou couldst have escaped me, save on this very scaffold (171).   This powerful line of descent from Chillingworth holds three meanings. First, Dimmesdale can save himself only through confession in public. Secondly, it shows the true sin and suffering in Chillingworth himself. In this regard, the line is just as important in reiterating the sickness in Chillingworth as it is in showing the torment in Dimmesdale. Finally, this statement creates a parallel between Chillingworths idea of justice and the Puritans.   The theme Hawthorne builds up in Chillingworth is not simply his pain and torment. It is a more important representation of the weakness in the values of the people in Puritan times, and how their perseverance for justice skewed their views on life and forgiveness. Because of his mindset, Chillingworth torments himself with his goal to destroy Dimmesdale just as much as Dimmesdale tortures himself for their seven years together. Chillingworth is laying waste his own life and does not realize it, because he no longer sees the value in life as he tries to ruin one.   The first foreshadow we see of Chillingworths obsession begins... ...h life because of that. Dimmesdale, on the other hand, faced Puritan torture under Chillingworth for the seven years without benefit of the release of guilt Hester had open by being in the public eye. Dimmesdales only release from guilt was not the scaffold, but death itself.   Hawthornes statement through Chillingworth offers insight into Dimmesdale and Chillingworth along with a representation of Hawthornes disapproval of the Puritan values. This disapproval is the driving force of the novel, and it underlies the relationship between Dimmesdale, Chillingworth, and the prevailing greater justice of God. The contrast of the Puritans justice and Gods makes the message of the spirit level greater than a love story or a story of a sin. With this theme, The Scarlet Letter becomes a comparison of the flawed justice of serviceman and the divine justice of God.  
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Interruptions and Delayed Explanations in Act III of The Crucible Essay
The Crucible EssayIn act three opportunities constantly arise for the whole difficulty of the dally to be cle bed up satisfactorily, but these are always frustrated. Show how this act is one of interruptions and explanations which are tragically delayed. The crucible is a play written by Arthur miller and concerns the multitude hysteria, which led to the 1692 Salem witchcraft trials in the U.S.A. At that time the people who lived in Salem believed in witches and the devil. They believed that the account book told them that witches should be hanged and they were required to live by strict puritan laws.The main characters of the play are Elizabeth reminder and her husband derriere. John had an affair with their maid, Abigail, and it was her intention to annul Elizabeth and marry John Proctor herself. afterwards Elizabeth and other members of the community pay off been arrested on charges of witchcraft, the trial begins and there are many opportunities to show that the people arrested were ingenuous but the many interruptions make this impossible. At the start of act 1 Martha Corey is being questioned by judge Danforth and Hathorne to see if she had been involved in witchcraft. Her husband, Giles Corey interrupts to say that Putnam wants everyones land. Thomas Putnam is reaching out for land. Corey says that he has certify to prove this.Then he is interrupted by Reverend Parris who undermines Coreys evidence by reflexion he was a very disputative person. Corey is interrupted again by Francis Nurse who says that the girls are all frauds We have proof of it sir they are all deceiving you. John Proctor arrives in the court with bloody shame Warren and the evidence as well but they are interrupted by Parris who tries to blacken Proctors name by say... ...s a whore and she has a demand to kill his wife. Proctors wife is called in and Proctor has already told the court that she never lies, could never lie. Elizabeth Proctor is asked about Proctors relati onship with Abigail and she said he had done nothing wrong. To save her husband, because committing adultery is a hanging offence, she tells that lie and condemns him.Proctor asks Mary to continue with her evidence but she turns against him and accuses him of being in conference with the devil, youre the Devils man she points at him she says she will not hang with him and tells the court that he told her, Ill murder you, if my wife hangs. Proctor tells Danforth you are pulling heaven down, and raising up a whore If any of the people had been allowed to give their evidence without interruptions, the emergence of the court case might have been different. Interruptions and Delayed Explanations in Act III of The Crucible EssayThe Crucible EssayIn act three opportunities constantly arise for the whole problem of the play to be cleared up satisfactorily, but these are always frustrated. Show how this act is one of interruptions and explanations which are tragically d elayed. The crucible is a play written by Arthur miller and concerns the mass hysteria, which led to the 1692 Salem witchcraft trials in the U.S.A. At that time the people who lived in Salem believed in witches and the devil. They believed that the bible told them that witches should be hanged and they were required to live by strict puritan laws.The main characters of the play are Elizabeth Proctor and her husband John. John had an affair with their maid, Abigail, and it was her intention to destroy Elizabeth and marry John Proctor herself. After Elizabeth and other members of the community have been arrested on charges of witchcraft, the trial begins and there are many opportunities to show that the people arrested were innocent but the many interruptions make this impossible. At the start of act 1 Martha Corey is being questioned by judge Danforth and Hathorne to see if she had been involved in witchcraft. Her husband, Giles Corey interrupts to say that Putnam wants everyones la nd. Thomas Putnam is reaching out for land. Corey says that he has evidence to prove this.Then he is interrupted by Reverend Parris who undermines Coreys evidence by saying he was a very argumentative person. Corey is interrupted again by Francis Nurse who says that the girls are all frauds We have proof of it sir they are all deceiving you. John Proctor arrives in the court with Mary Warren and the evidence as well but they are interrupted by Parris who tries to blacken Proctors name by say... ...s a whore and she has a motive to kill his wife. Proctors wife is called in and Proctor has already told the court that she never lies, could never lie. Elizabeth Proctor is asked about Proctors relationship with Abigail and she said he had done nothing wrong. To save her husband, because committing adultery is a hanging offence, she tells that lie and condemns him.Proctor asks Mary to continue with her evidence but she turns against him and accuses him of being in league with the devil, youre the Devils man she points at him she says she will not hang with him and tells the court that he told her, Ill murder you, if my wife hangs. Proctor tells Danforth you are pulling heaven down, and raising up a whore If any of the people had been allowed to give their evidence without interruptions, the outcome of the court case might have been different.
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Robert Frosts Directive Essay example -- Robert Frost Directive Essay
Robert ices directionalThe speaker of Directive is the Robert Frost we know well. He gives us a scene that he has looked at in a air no peerless else does and seen things that no one else sees. The ghost town made simple by the loss of detail (2-3) is dazzlingly rich. If, as Frost habitually does, we were to conjure up a fully-fleshed cloaked behind this simple condition, perhaps we would dead reckoning that a scene of scraped land and forty cellar holes is more than comme il faut grist for Frosts mill, and anything else would call for poetic fireworks that would overshadow his theme. This metrical composition is an insightful allegory on the Grail symbol, made strange by Frosts characteristic subversive and introverted nature.Frost offers to be our guide, but warns us that he is a guide who only has at heart your getting lost(9). It is as direct an admission as you could ask for, although he usually offers others approximately as unmistakable. For example, in The Wood-Pile, after announcing that he is so foolish as to think he knew what a minor bird thinks, he goes on to guess at both the birds moti... Robert Frosts Directive Essay example -- Robert Frost Directive EssayRobert Frosts DirectiveThe speaker of Directive is the Robert Frost we know well. He gives us a scene that he has looked at in a way no one else does and seen things that no one else sees. The ghost town made simple by the loss of detail (2-3) is dazzlingly rich. If, as Frost habitually does, we were to conjure up a fully-fleshed intent behind this simple condition, perhaps we would guess that a scene of scraped land and forty cellar holes is more than enough grist for Frosts mill, and anything else would call for poetic fireworks that would overshadow his theme. This poem is an insightful allegory on the Grail symbol, made strange by Frosts characteristic subversive and introverted nature.Frost offers to be our guide, but warns us that he is a guide who only has at he art your getting lost(9). It is as direct an admission as you could ask for, although he usually offers others nearly as unmistakable. For example, in The Wood-Pile, after announcing that he is so foolish as to think he knew what a small bird thinks, he goes on to guess at both the birds moti...
Teleportation :: essays research papers
TeleportationIf I had a chose between two superpowers, to turn invisible or flight, I would break the rules and convey to give birth the ability of teleportation. I was ready to answer right away, but I put some thought into this question, such as the capabilities and limitations of these superpowers. If I fly, can I carry people or objects just by touching them (ala Superman 2)? Would I be able to carry something, someone equal to, or more(prenominal) than my own weight or would this be too much of a challenge while flying? I would probably worry about complete sufficient oxygen, since flying requires air to work, just as swimming requires water. The higher I go the more lack of oxygen, the slower I will depart in proportion to the thinning air, in that locationfore no flying in space. In addition, it is very important to remember I am not invincible. Therefore, if I try to fly through a brick wall, I would definitely injure myself this also applies if I collide with a plane or bird.If I would choose to be invisible, I hope that everything I am wearing will turn invisible too and I would not have to strip naked as a jaybird or anything. If other invisible people want to, fine, I am not going to stop them. More power to them for being comfortable with there body. I hope that this would not be required. If I am invisible, would I have a small invisibility gloriole surrounding me, and would the things caught in that aura go invisible? If I pick something up, does it turn invisible, or does it just float there or if I drop something, would it be visible again, whether I like it or not? For example, if I was wearing an invisible baseball cap, and threw it in the air, would it be visible after leaving my hand? In addition, would it be invisible again if I catch it? If I want that hat to be invisible, do have to tuck it under my shirt (ala Harry Potters invisibility cloak), or turn visible and then back invisible to catch the stuff I am holding. Therefore, i f I were going to choose this superpower, God forbid, if I rob a bank, and slip into the vault, I would have to stuff the money into my pants and shirt to avoid the cheesy movie effect of money adrift(p) out of the bank.
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Public Slave System :: essays papers
Public Slave System In 1999, a young man named Ryan John Sargeant removed himself from the mankind school system. His garner of intent, filled with harsh, condemnatory rhetoric, decried a school system that uses students as, ? a means to an end, a worthless commodity. Pupils are made nothing but civilizeers by the educational system.? Such words would aptly describe a proposal by the United States government activity, which calls for three years of mandatory public service following amply school before pursuing any higher education. A sweeping educational reform of this type sacrifices the Constitutional, personal, and moral rights of the individual students in favor of the public good, creating a new class of disenfranchised and rebellious youths.A mandatory post-high school public service program violates the Constitution of the United States. In Amendment Thirteen, arm One, the Constitution states that ?Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude emphasis added ? shal l exist within the United States A proposal to involuntarily enlist students from the ages of 18-23 in forms of public service (or servitude) blatantly attacks the presumptuousness of this basic constitutional right of everyone, including students in the school system. Additionally, the Declaration of Independence, that touchstone of ?unalienable rights,? provides its citizens with ?Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.? Through a public works mandate , the government itself would be depriving each student of their ?unalienable right? to have liberty from oppressive mandatory requirements, barring them from pursuing happiness in whatever way of life they choose. Furthermore, the Declaration of Independence defines a government as a system ?instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.? Again, a mandatory work program for students attacks the important values of a government for the people, by the people, in favor of a government tha t legislates basic rights to its people. In countries built without such documents of inalienable rights, mandatory work programs are the norm for their students. In the United States, however, these programs violate the rights of each individual as demanded by the law.Mandatory work programs for students also break a heavy moral code, alluded to by the Constitution, found in many religious and governmental societies around the earth. As the Constitution recognizes, there exists a ?Law of Nature,? and certain entitlements correspond to that Law. Among these entitlements is the inalienable right that ?
Public Slave System :: essays papers
Public Slave System In 1999, a young man named Ryan joke Sargeant removed himself from the public school system. His letter of intent, filled with harsh, condemnatory rhetoric, decried a school system that uses students as, ? a means to an end, a worthless commodity. Pupils are do nothing but realizeers by the educational system.? Such words would aptly describe a proposal by the United States government, which calls for three years of mandatory public service following high school before move any higher education. A sweeping educational reform of this type sacrifices the Constitutional, personal, and chaste rights of the individual students in favor of the public good, creating a new class of disenfranchised and rebellious youths.A mandatory post-high school public service course violates the Constitution of the United States. In Amendment Thirteen, Section One, the Constitution states that ?Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude emphasis added ? shall exist withi n the United States A proposal to involuntarily enlist students from the ages of 18-23 in forms of public service (or servitude) blatantly attacks the premise of this basic constitutional right of everyone, including students in the school system. Additionally, the Declaration of Independence, that touchstone of ?unalienable rights,? provides its citizens with ?Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.? Through a public works mandate , the government itself would be depriving each student of their ?unalienable right? to have liberty from oppressive mandatory requirements, barring them from pursuing happiness in whatever manner they choose. Furthermore, the Declaration of Independence defines a government as a system ?instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.? Again, a mandatory work program for students attacks the fundamental values of a government for the people, by the people, in favor of a government that legislates basic rights to its people. In countries create without such documents of inalienable rights, mandatory work programs are the norm for their students. In the United States, however, these programs violate the rights of each individual as demanded by the law.Mandatory work programs for students also break a fundamental moral code, alluded to by the Constitution, found in many religious and governmental societies around the earth. As the Constitution recognizes, there exists a ?Law of Nature,? and certain entitlements according to that Law. Among these entitlements is the inalienable right that ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)